Bombay HC says BCCI probe panel on spot-fixing illegal

104 0

In a major blow to the cricket board (BCCI) and its former president N Srinivasan, and his plan to return to the board,  the Bombay High CourtTuesday held as "illegal and unconstitutional" the two-member probe panel set up to look into allegations of spot-fixing and betting in the IPL tournament, and which gave a clean everyone accused spot-fixing. But a shameless Srinivasan hinted that he doesn’t give a damn to the court ruling and that he would be chairing the BCCI board meeting slated for August 2.

 

The order comes merely two days after the probe panel gave clean chit to Srinivasan, his son-in-law and owner of Chennai Super Kings team Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra, owner of Rajasthan Royals and husband of actress Shilpa Shetty. A division bench of justices SJ Vazifdar and MS Sonak was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Cricket Association of Bihar and its secretary Aditya Verma challenging the constitution of the two-member commission, set up by the BCCI and IPL governing council to probe the allegations of betting and spot fixing. The bench, while allowing the PIL, said the constitution of the probe panel was "illegal and unconstitutional." "We have succeeded and the court has accepted our contentions. It is now up to the BCCI to see what is to be done next," advocate Amit Naik, who appeared along with senior counsels Virendra Tulzapurkar and Birendra Saraf for the petitioner, said.

 

The petition alleged blatant bias by former BCCI president Srinivasan in the light of mounting allegations against himself and in constituting the probe panel as he is the vice-chairman and managing director of India Cements, which owns the IPL team – Chennai Super Kings. The PIL urged the court to direct BCCI to recall its order constituting the probe panel and instead the court shall form a panel of retired judges as it may deem fit to hold inquiry against Meiyappan, India Cements and Jaipur IPL Cricket with regard to their involvement in spot fixing and betting. BCCI and Srinivasan, in their reply affidavits, termed the petition as "motivated and vested with personal interests."

Related Post

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *